Unselfish acts?

We had a fascinating opening conversation about Karen Armstrong’s Twelve Steps to a Compassionate Life at the Lent Group tonight.  We were talking about whether compassion is innate or a learned behaviour.  It will have important consequences today, we felt, as the welfare state contracts and much institutionalised ‘compassion’ is left to the voluntary sector in the Big Society.

Looking back at the last great surge of voluntary charity, the Victorian era, it is clear that there had to be a hearts-and-minds campaign, partly through media such as Dickens’ novels, but also through the Church.  Think of those hymns and carols – such as Good King Wenceslas, published by J.M. Neale in 1853, with the closing words:

Therefore, Christian men, be sure,  wealth or rank possessing, Ye who now will bless the poor,  shall yourselves find blessing.

Will the Church be as influential now?   Or is there a fountain of secular compassion that will fill the gap of meals-on-wheels being cut, and Citizens Advice Bureaux, and day centres, and facilities for the disabled?

The other fascinating topic was why people put their lives at risk  – not least, as workers exposed to radiation in the Fukushima nuclear plant in Japan.  Is it altruism, or is there a kind of conditioning that makes it ‘second nature’ – as with firefighters, or soldiers?  You can understand a parent risking their life to save their child, or a someone doing that for their dearest friend.  But we find it worthy of remark and heroic (i.e. not normal) for someone to give their life for a stranger.

And of course, we got on to Phoebe in Friends, and her attempt to find a truly unselfish act.  She lets a bee sting her “so it can look cool in front of its bee friends.”  She is crestfallen when  Joey points out that the bee probably died after it lost its sting in her arm.  You can see the clip on YouTube here.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Church, compassion, films, Lent. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Unselfish acts?

  1. Eamonn says:

    Whether there is a fountain of secular compassion or not, I think that one of the jobs of the Church in this situation is not merely to fill the gaps but to call the state to account for its harsh policies.

  2. alisonpeden says:

    Yes, though it’s to do with choices which can also be harsh, I suppose. ‘To govern is to choose.’ So we choose to join the air forces sending planes to Libya – planes which ar due to be scrapped, and whose deployment will cost money that could have been spent on social services. And then you hear the voice of a desperate man in Benghazi, who is later reported dead, crying out against the bombing. How do you choose?

  3. Libby says:

    I think there is a fountain of “secular” compassion that is spiritual. A challenge for the church is allying with such groups whilst remaining distinctive but not superior in tone.

    I am also curious about the duration of compassion. I can feel very compassionate in response to a particular situation but know that the feelings can diminish.

    Looking forward to Thursday evening’s discussion.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s